Music that hypnotizes (part 1)

This article has been temporarily translated using an online translator. The original article is in Italian. If you would like to help us improve the translation in your language, please contact us by email: info@accademiadicoscienzadimensionale.it or via chat on ACD. Thank you.

Page 1 of 7

In volume 7 of Apatìa I mentioned what connects hypnosis to music, mentioning that it is by no means a coincidence that most fantasies begin precisely while one is listening to music, and while it seems obvious, the real reason it happens is not. Music is supposed to calm thoughts, not increase them out of all proportion. However, it is a medium that has been used as a government weapon specifically to hypnotize minds. Let us start from the fact that those who believe that "music of yesteryear" was not hypnotic and exploited by the government to manipulate us, and that only today's music is being used to manipulate young people, are very wrong. If we start from the very simple song about "coca-cola" entitled "Bubbles" in 1983, which, in addition to advertising the same drink of the Multinationals, made strong references to drugs, while most people believed that there was nothing wrong with those songs, we quickly understand that all commercial music-including records that are considered "non-commercial" but are- were serving a greater purpose. It is clear and obvious to everyone's eyes that the "music" of the 2000s, especially that produced in the last 15 years cannot even be considered music anymore, but electronic or "noisy" sounds, such as simple and annoying percussion noises, which serve specifically to accustom us to the metallic sounds of alien technologies. Even the current music fad of modified electronic voices serves to habituate us to the metallic sounds and voices that are heard in the presence Alien and humans using their own technology on their behalf. The fashion for "asmr" sounds functions in the same way, in fact dare I say worse, to accustom abductees from Alien experiments to appreciate "whispered" sounds that are generally heard in the presence of Operators and during experiments that are carried out during abductions. "Whispered" voices take root in the minds of those who have become so submissive to alien abductions that they appreciate asmr sounds as familiar; those who significantly Practice Against Artificiality, on the other hand, feel enormous distaste toward asmr sounds and whispered voices precisely because they remind them of alien abduction experiences/Operator voices and therefore steer clear of such annoying sounds. 

Finding relaxation and pleasure in falling asleep while listening to asmr sounds evokes the dark experiences during abductions, in which one is sedated and put to sleep with substances while doctors and scientists present whisper so as not to be heard/understood by the subject; however, these experiences are categorized in one's brain as "pleasant, relaxing" because of the sedatives and psychotropic drugs that doctors administer to abduction victims to keep them calm and tame, during the experiments they carry out on them. We always talk about terrible experiments, never pleasant, regardless of how the brain stores them being succubus to artificial manipulations. It must be recognized that enormous brainwashing and hypnosis are put into practice in abduction victims and how crucial it is to "come out" of that sense of familiarity and pleasure in hearing such sounds. Those, on the other hand, who remember more lucidly the alien/government abduction experiences they have had and undergone, also remember the "whispering" of the doctors and operators present during the experiments they underwent and how much suffering they experienced during those moments. Therefore, these sounds cause the subject a strong sense of discomfort, precisely because he more correctly associates them with very negative and suffering events; nothing pleasant, although sedatives make such experiences appear calm and peaceful. Beyond personal tastes, which really count for nothing in this context, what we need to understand is what the government inserts inside the music to hypnotize our minds. In the previous volume I explained to you how the Government uses flashes of light to turn on or off certain areas of our brains, which also means inserting data inside the subject's mind and then activating it when the Government wants, remotely, at any time. 

Page 2 of 7

The same can be done through sounds; indeed, for the sake of the record, technologies that use sound are even older and more widely used than technologies that take advantage of flashes/flashes of light. In fact, the Nazi government used technologies that fired very annoying and invasive sounds within neural networks as early as World War II, both at enemies and defenseless citizens, to the point of killing them on the spot. These sound weapons were dangerous, but not exclusively because of the high volume at which the sounds were emitted, so much so that they caused physical damage in the ear; rather, they were dangerous mainly because of the waves/frequencies they emanated, which managed to hypnotize the brain to the point of making it go mad almost instantly. Those who heard that sound died on the spot or even ran to commit suicide, for no apparent reason. It was not just physical pain but something that clicked inside the mind, due to the sounds studied by the Nazi and then American governments and then used to subdue their enemies, including citizens. (Read also http://www.rolandofustos.it/?p=828 and https://thevision.com/scienza/microonde-arma-guerra/ and  https://it.topwar.ru/14746-akusticheskaya-pushka-richarda-vallausheka-chudo-oruzhie-tretego- reyha.html , read also about "LRAD" used today by the forces of disorder stemming from the origin of "Schallkanone.") The Nazi government discovered that it could use psychotronic weapons that directly affected the brain and thus the neurons via sound, bringing vibrations to the ear that caused immediate imbalances in the brain. These weapons were soon made "illegal," just like nerve gas (which, quote "Chemically similar to pesticides, Vx is the most potent of all nerve agents and is considered a weapon of mass destruction and for this reason banned by a number of international agreements including the Geneva Protocol of 1925 and the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993"), since these were excessively "powerful" weapons. But how could the government be expected to deprive itself of extremely functional, powerful weapons capable of getting it what it wants, all the more so if it provokes such violent reactions within the human body? Obviously making those weapons illegal served more to delude the people into thinking that the government would no longer use them, rather than actually stop using them. Are bombs perhaps not violent enough? Do they not offer enough power? Of course they do, but that they are "illegal" is just a word to deceive the people that they will no longer be dropped, but the truth is that the government does what it wants, and if it decides to drop them tomorrow, the people who believed they were "illegal" will continue to claim they are illegal even after the bomb is dropped. In other words, those who still believe that the government abides by the rules it has imposed on humanity means that they are sleeping a very deep sleep that not even a bomb, literally, could wake them up. 

The technologies used to produce sounds so intrusive as to manipulate the brains of victims forced to listen/sorb those vibrations were then carried on through Nazi scientists under the command of the U.S. government, thus developing the technologies that we humans endure today. It is unthinkable that technologies that were used decades ago-even more than a century ago-have not been updated to exploit them in modern times. The use of those technological and psychotronic weapons was never stopped in earnest, but the government had to make the people believe that it would suspend all studies and technological advances involving those weapons, and the people believed it. But if those results could have been had now a century ago, we can only imagine what kind of upgrades they have been able to give to the same technologies. Today those same technologies are being used to completely hypnotize mankind through very precise sounds hidden within all songs that come on the radio, regardless of whether they are famous or emerging singers, whether they are Italian or American songs, whether they are pop or trap. 

Page 3 of 7

Unfortunately, to this day, personal taste counts for nothing, so it is not enough to keep away from the songs or styles of music that we most feel are "loud and annoying," because all songs, all of them, hide inaudible vibrations that even the singers and musicians themselves do not know that those above the record companies added before releasing them worldwide. In fact, it is good to make it clear that the singer or musician is not at all aware of what is secretly being put inside his or her songs, or for most of them at least they are not aware of it. It all takes place during the very last passages, as the song is about to be recorded on CD and then sent to the radio (and thus sent through signals/frequencies that will hit the Antennas and repeaters, which consequently will hit our heads over and over again each day) a certain strand of sounds imperceptible to the ear, which is not part of the melody, and which will serve precisely to hit our brains, is now inserted automatically by the setting managed by the AI. 

Then, with some songs it is more noticeable than others. You notice that when you listen to some songs immediately afterwards you feel unreasonably nervous, stressed, as if you have had a bad day or are very fatigued, although it is not like that, but it is derived from listening to those songs. With others, you notice how your emotional state immediately becomes depressed/pessimistic, and only by listening to those "sad" tunes do you begin to find reasons, memories and thoughts, even fanciful ones but which you mistake for real, to be sad yourself. We all know that this is how it works, that music has a strong influence on our emotional and psychological field, yet we take it for granted as if nothing happened. Because everyone knows this, we think we should ignore what is happening in the reality of everyday events. But it is not so, and we should not ignore at all what is behind all this big project on the collective. On the other hand, you only notice it when the songs you are listening to immediately come across as noisy or sad/depressing, so you think that they are the only problem, and that the others are not causing any harm at all. Contrary to what you think, those brain-damaging vibrations are put into any kind of song you might be listening to today, because in addition to putting those invisible sounds into the songs themselves, it's also the technologies we use to play them that are designed to produce other invisible sounds that are damaging to our brains; so if they don't hit us on one side they hit us on the other side, but the problem is that they mostly hit us at the same time on both sides. 

On certain songs you can hear really annoying sounds that cause you nervousness and emotional stress; it allows you to understand what effect they have on all those people who listen to them on a daily basis even over and over again a day. But the worst is inaudible, so even those sounds that you recognize as hidden and annoying (because they are tucked in between the various tunes with a lower pitch as if to be almost hidden) are not as serious as those sounds that are inaudible to the human but affect our brains just the same. These are vibrations that are hidden inside and cannot even be considered melodies because they are mixes of short rhythmic sounds and other short fixed, linear sounds, some of which sound like rustling, and other sounds that if you could hear them you would recognize as very annoying. All of these hidden sounds serve to keep our mental vibration perpetually low, unbeknownst to us and even against our strength, because no matter how hard we try to be high toned if we then put those songs on our headphones (or even on the radio, for example when we are in the car) we get hit by all of those vibrations penetrating into our brain. 

Page 4 of 7

The government leaves us no choice, which is why it doesn't matter if you never listen to music, you're bound to walk into the supermarket and hear music left on the till, or stop at a bar and hear the radio on, or even go to the gym and find the music blasting. It doesn't matter if you try to ignore the music or if you didn't even realize it was on because of how low it was: the fact is that it affects you anyway, it affects us constantly. Of course it is that we cannot pretend not to understand that being hit by certain invisible sounds from time to time, for example those 20 minutes when we are shopping for groceries, is different from listening to hours and hours in a row to those same tunes directly in our headphones, moreover with bluetooth and wi-fi headphones as if it is not enough for us to be hit by radio waves day and night but we want even more! So first of all, it is good to go back to dear old wired headphones, thus avoiding wi-fi headphones, at least to scale back the damage done to our brains. What we can avoid we should avoid: while there are few items on which we can choose, where we still have a choice we should at least take the right choice i.e. the least harmful to us! Let us avoid following fads, which will only lead us to harm ourselves faster. 

We can observe how over the years the style of music is moving toward smashing, both in terms of lyrics and melodies, and in terms of the absence of humanity toward music, since to this day most lyrics and melodies are written by AI and consequently both melodies and words are repeated. In the past, lyrics were written by songwriters or Ghostwriters, a term for the unknown writers behind the most famous songs; roughly all singers have always used other writers to write and then set the musical rhythm of their future songs, and the singers thus would only have to lend their beautiful voices and... take all the credit. Ghostwriters in fact do not get any public credit, however, many people are fine with working as Ghostwriters since the pay is acceptable according to the current economic situation which is ridiculous to say the least. In other words, the pay is little but as they say better little than nothing. So far so good as long as they were apparently writing good lyrics and designing good melodies. What always spoiled them was the government, which during the official release of every song released on the radio exploited art and thus music to insert brain-damaging vibrations inside, so that these would penetrate inside human minds during playful, recreational, or leisure moments with friends. Unfortunately, we have to remember that if the government allows us to use a technology for recreational activities that are pleasant for us, it means that it has already inserted one of its control projects behind it, as it has also done in this case: it has allowed us to exploit advanced military technologies such as the radio, to amuse ourselves and listen to music, to spread through the same tunes of sounds it inserted that we would have gladly listened to, albeit without our knowledge, because they were hidden within the songs we like to listen to. 

Some people might now think that they never listen to the radio but rather that they only hear music through youtube or spotify or other engines for listening to music and consequently convince themselves that they are not affected by the radio waves or the harmful vibrations inserted by the government within the songs. Obviously this is not the case, because both youtube and spotify belong to and are exploited at the highest levels by the government, so one is affected by the same vibrations and even far worse, since the latter use technologies that are even much more invasive than just radio. So it is better not to underestimate the situation. 

Page 5 of 7

Nonetheless, it is important to realize how music has "evolved" until today, which has reached the height of shame, in which the lyrics speak exclusively about orgies, drugs, sex, violence, orgies again, and more drugs. In the past they used to try to hide the terms behind secret phrases or sayings that few people knew, but the fact that today anyone can and should sing publicly only songs about drugs and sex should make us realize that it is not the young people who want to sing this, but it is the government that wants to push young people to believe that those are the right ways, exploiting the faces of other young people-junkies to the point of absurdity-to attract them and make them believe that those are the idols to follow. So little boys will believe that to become men they will have to imitate their idols and become interested from a very young age in drugs (we mean as early as 10 years old, even earlier), and little girls will believe that to become women, beautiful and famous they will have to imitate their idols and become interested from a very young age in becoming tiny prostitutes, all this not because little boys and girls are at fault or want to do this, but because the government is imposing this reality on young people and parents are quite happy to abandon their children in front of a cell phone instead of raising and educating them with their own strength, patience, and commitment. 

The "freedom of speech" for which always the Government pushes us to fight against each other, while the same Government takes away more and more from us every day-although in certain historical periods thanks to powerful figures the people have managed to take back that right a little-as of today it is being censored more and more, as is also happening on music. In fact, if today's songs are exclusively about sex and drugs, it is not because people today are unimaginative and don't know how to write good music, but because record companies don't accept them, they don't accept songs that talk about positive or word-tag-free Propaganda lyrics, but only release singers/groups that make music that talks about it right away, or singers/groups that will pretend for some time to be "clean" but will serve solely to capture the few remaining young people who have not been converted to those ideas and will slowly lead them too to the same topics: sex and drugs. The false "evolution" of the singer from being pure and chaste to becoming a slut has always been a project of those who are above the record companies and who are really in charge. It does not happen by accident, it is not the singer who changes her tastes or grows up, but it is the record agency (which follows the commands of the government) that had decided her fate from a very young age, deciding every single step she would have to take in order to be followed by as many children and young people as possible.

Music is the most widely used Propaganda tool in the last century, starting with American singers who became famous for love songs or peace songs, who were then the "frontmen" to attract people to government-pushed drugs and to specific truly dangerous Sects, including the best-known Freemasonry. Just think how in America the current famous singers and actresses-especially those followed by young people-when there was the fraud of the falsified votes on which President should take office between Biden and Trump-votes that were in favor of the latter but were illegally altered to make Biden appear the most voted for (a fraud publicly acknowledged by all including by a great many TV journalists, yet nothing has changed), regardless of the fact that neither can be trusted and that we always go for the lesser of two evils and not the good and the bad - female singers instantly started releasing pro- Biden songs and actresses filming themselves mocking Trump's downfall. All demonstrating how they belonged to the government for which Biden had a very useful role, especially toward the trafficking of pedophilia, prostitution, drugs, and so on. 

Page 6 of 7

All this must have seemed very strange since the instant release of songs about the president, with almost no time to know who would win the election, should have made a lot of people realize how much lying there was behind the election and also behind those singers and actresses who became famous precisely because their role was and is of enormous use to the government. 

So it should make us think about how music is used to publicize events, life paths, even politics, that the government wants us to follow, and certainly not for what it would really serve. Music, especially sung songs, was meant to inform people of events that were being silenced and served to spread views and freedom of speech that the press otherwise censored, but it soon became for advertising purposes only, censoring the real news and exploiting music to exclusively spread the will of the government. That is why one cannot rely at all on the lyrics of music even when they seem to be talking about something very right, but must look at who it is that sings them and where that "frontman" would lead us if we followed him. The "positive" lyrics are often thrown in there like the hook precisely to hook as many fish as possible (i.e., people who dissent from the government's will) and then accompany them right where the government wants them to go, through the later lyrics, making the public more and more compliant to the government's will. 

Today more and more songs are being written by AI, but what is even worse is that they are being sung by AI, while people convince themselves that they are listening to the real voice of the singer/songwriter. Every day more and more hot news is coming out regarding music, that is, more and more names of singers who actually do not go to the studio to record songs for a long time, because they do not sing at all. Singers have been made to sign a contract in which the agency will take use of the singer's voice and face in order to use it for upcoming releases; but this in private has been happening for well over 10 years. Just think of the singers who died and were replaced with impersonators, whose voices, however, could not be compared, and thus AI was exploited to reconstruct the voice and "make it sing" new lyrics. However, this technology for many years was used more in private, that is, without all the singers knowing the same, so that even they did not know how it was possible to replace a dead singer (often killed by the same agency and/or the government) with an artificial voice that was even better than the real thing, because the artificial voice does not stunt, does not need to be warmed up, and can be instantly modified to make it hit any kind of note without having to do any training. In recent years then, AI technology has also become commonly used toward live singers, in order to associate their voices with lyrics that so many would have refused to sing or could not sing because of pitch issues. On the other hand, it is normal for increasingly toxic singers (due to drugs, smoking, and alcohol) to fail to have a clear voice. Agencies have found a way to deceive singers and listeners, and associate their faces with songs that they would not want to sing, but AI does since it has no thought of its own and no choice, and that fans would not have listened to if they knew the truth from the start; but not knowing this, they listen and buy the CDs or music to download. So the singer signs the contract to lend his voice to the agency that will do what it wants with it, and he ends up with even ridiculous or sleazy songs in his name that he never wanted to sing or that he never would have been able to sing with his real voice, but that he will have to carry in his "career" forever, since by contract he cannot reveal which songs are really sung by him/her or which ones the IA sang. 

Page 7 of 7

The singer lends his voice only once, then for the rest of the time he will not have to sing or anything else except for the rare times when the agency itself orders him to do so. However, for the rest he will live off the income, that is, he will earn the money from the songs he did not sing, and he will live his life according to what the government wants. The income for the singers will be less and less, more and more, precisely because the songs will no longer be sung by them, and since the AI voice will be able to sing better than anyone in the world, people would much rather listen to that perfect voice (even though they do not know it belongs to the AI) than to that voice which may be out of tune from time to time, or which takes too long to train. See well not to be fooled by the AI apps that have been all the rage lately to make the AI "sing" texts chosen by the public (and that anyone could select to play with these apps), because those apps are deliberately programmed to appear "out of tune" or by the "electronic" voices to make people believe that the highest level of AI achieved is the somewhat ... low level. All so that people do not realize that in fact we have already been listening to real AI music for several years, unbeknownst to us, convinced that we are listening to the voice of the real singer(s). 

End page 7 of 7. If you enjoyed the article, please comment below describing your feelings while reading or practicing the proposed technique.